After more than a twenty-year hiatus from body horror, the legendary David Cronenberg makes his long-awaited return to the genre with Crimes of the Future (which is completely unrelated to his previous 1970 feature of the same name).
As we descend on a grubby dystopian future made up of a bland/grey colour pallet it seems humanity has evolved to a point where they no longer feel pain… or anything for that matter, self-mutilation is all the rage as society spouts:
Surgery is the new sex.
And with that our hopes are immediately raised as it seems Cronenberg is going back to his routes.
We follow the life of Saul Tenser (Viggo Mortensen), a performing artist who withdraws the constant additional organs that continue to grow inside him. Although advantageous for his career, this is not the case for Saul’s downtime as these “extra parts” make his day-to-day life a constant struggle, especially when it comes to his digestive system. Although, is it really the curse he thinks it is?
So, after Cronenberg’s long break from gruesome, gritty sci-fi, was the movie worth the wait? For the most part, sadly not.
There are elements of the plot that really has legs but before it has a chance of gaining any momentum, the movie is already over. Unfortunately, this is accompanied by one-dimensional characters and pacing which at times almost grinds to a halt. Despite this, however, there are really enjoyable aspects, especially those hard-to-watch moments that make you feel all dirty inside – which only someone like Cronenberg could get away with. From ear-men art exhibitions to bone chairs that help you eat (but definitely seem to make the process harder) the director does what he does best.
The main issue could be the fact he has pushed the envelope further decades prior with the likes of Videodrome and eXistenZ (which coincidently also had the working title Crimes of the Future). Or maybe when you look at the overall movie it just seems to be about a guy with dietary restrictions.
All in all, it’s worth a watch as there really are some intriguing concepts and if nothing else, just to see the master of body horror back in the habit.
Jacked in Reviews ‘Beetlejuice Beetlejuice’ (2024)
Tim Burton’s sequel to the 1988 cult classic once again follows the Deetz’s, with Lydia (Winona Ryder) […]
Jacked In Recommends ‘Rear Window’ (1954)
An Alfred Hitchock classic, Rear Window follows the life of L.B. Jeffries (James Stewart), a recently […]
Jacked In Reviews ‘Aldbrough’ (2023)
Gail Smith’s Aldbrough gives us a grainy, 8mm window into the past with archive footage of a town long gone.
Jacked In Recommends ‘The Descent’ (2005)
A year after the tragic loss of her husband and daughter, Sarah (Shauna Macdonald) goes on a hiking trip with her […]
Jacked In Reviews ‘Saltburn’ (2023)
Academy Award-winning, Emerald Fennell brings us her much-anticipated follow-up to Promising Young Woman. The […]
Jacked In Recommends ‘Hereditary’ (2018)
Following the life of a dysfunctional family, as they grieve, this abysmal world and the characters within it […]
Jacked In Reviews ‘The Substance’ (2024)
We join the once-great Elisabeth Sparkle (Demi Moore) as she is abruptly pushed out of the spotlight – now […]
Jacked In Recommends ‘Man Bites Dog’ (1992)
Man Bites Dog AKA C’est arrivé près de chez vous (1992) is a darkly comedic mockumentary that sees a film […]
Jacked In Reviews ‘Die Hard’ (1988)
To solve the ongoing debate for whether or not Die Hard is in fact a Christmas movie, Jacked In’s Jack, […]
Jacked In Reviews ‘Mean’ (2023)
Director, Joshua Blewitt brings us chauvinistic, narcissist, movie lover and filmmaker, Chez Florentine (Joe […]
Jacked In Recommends ‘The Lost Daughter’ (2021)
Based on the novel by Elena Ferrante, The Lost Daughter tells the tale of Leda (Olivia Colman), a middle-aged, […]
Jacked In Reviews ‘Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga’ (2024)
Before you can get comfy in your (IMAX, obviously) seat, George Miller quickly answers the question raised upon our […]













